Metung vs Rockbank
Property investment comparison - Metung, VIC 3904 vs Rockbank, VIC 3335
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Metung wins 2, Rockbank wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Metung | Rockbank |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $630K | $630K |
| Median unit price | $200K | $530K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.20% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.33% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.5%estimate | +1.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -0.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 4.9% |
| Population | 1,899 | 2,583 |
Metung vs Rockbank: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $630K in Metung and $630K in Rockbank.
For units, Metung sits at a median of $200K against $530K in Rockbank, which makes Metung the more affordable unit market and Rockbank the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved -0.5% in Metung (an estimate) and +1.4% in Rockbank, so recent momentum favours Rockbank, while Metung went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 2.8% in Metung and 4.9% in Rockbank, so landlords in Metung face less competition for tenants.
Rockbank is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,583 against 1,899, larger than Metung; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rockbank for recent price momentum, Metung for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison