Skip to main content

Miandetta vs Swansea

Property investment comparison - Miandetta, TAS 7310 vs Swansea, TAS 7190

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Miandetta wins 4, Swansea wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMiandettaSwansea
Median house price$635K$635K
Median unit price$450K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%3.72%
Gross rental yield (units)5.17%4.47%
1-year house growth+15.3%-3.8%estimate
3-year house growth+27.9%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.7%
Population1,822997

Miandetta vs Swansea: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $635K in Miandetta and $635K in Swansea.

On cash flow, Miandetta leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 3.72% in Swansea, a gap of 0.98 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.3% in Miandetta and -3.8% in Swansea (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Miandetta, while Swansea went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Miandetta and 1.7% in Swansea, so landlords in Miandetta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Miandetta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,822 against 997, larger than Swansea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Miandetta for rental income, Miandetta for recent price momentum, Miandetta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison