Skip to main content

Milabena vs Primrose Sands

Property investment comparison - Milabena, TAS 7325 vs Primrose Sands, TAS 7173

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Milabena wins 0, Primrose Sands wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMilabenaPrimrose Sands
Median house price$525K$525K
Median unit price-$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.02%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.68%
1-year house growth+4.9%+12.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.2%2.2%
Population771,209

Milabena vs Primrose Sands: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $525K in Milabena and $525K in Primrose Sands.

On cash flow, Primrose Sands leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.02% in Milabena, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Milabena and +12.6% in Primrose Sands (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Primrose Sands, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Primrose Sands and 3.2% in Milabena, so landlords in Primrose Sands face less competition for tenants.

Primrose Sands is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,209 against 77, roughly 16 times the size of Milabena; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Primrose Sands for rental income, Primrose Sands for recent price momentum, Primrose Sands for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison