Skip to main content

Millbrook vs South Kingsville

Property investment comparison - Millbrook, VIC 3352 vs South Kingsville, VIC 3015

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Millbrook wins 3, South Kingsville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMillbrookSouth Kingsville
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$415K$895K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.53%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.46%2.80%
1-year house growth--9.3%
3-year house growth--20.2%
Vacancy rate1.9%2.2%
Population1802,156

Millbrook vs South Kingsville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Millbrook and $1.0M in South Kingsville.

For units, Millbrook sits at a median of $415K against $895K in South Kingsville, which makes Millbrook the more affordable unit market and South Kingsville the pricier one.

On cash flow, South Kingsville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.53% in Millbrook, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Millbrook and 2.2% in South Kingsville, so landlords in Millbrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Kingsville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,156 against 180, roughly 12 times the size of Millbrook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: South Kingsville for rental income, Millbrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison