Skip to main content

Miners Rest vs Myrtleford

Property investment comparison - Miners Rest, VIC 3352 vs Myrtleford, VIC 3737

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Miners Rest wins 3, Myrtleford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMiners RestMyrtleford
Median house price$650K$650K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.89%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)3.24%-
1-year house growth+12.1%+11.6%
3-year house growth+8.8%+8.0%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.7%
Population3,8293,285

Miners Rest vs Myrtleford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $650K in Miners Rest and $650K in Myrtleford.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.89% in Miners Rest and 3.86% in Myrtleford, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.1% in Miners Rest and +11.6% in Myrtleford, so recent momentum favours Miners Rest, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Miners Rest houses are +8.8% and Myrtleford houses +8.0%, so Miners Rest has compounded faster than Myrtleford over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Myrtleford and 0.7% in Miners Rest, so landlords in Myrtleford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Miners Rest is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,829 against 3,285, larger than Myrtleford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Miners Rest for recent price momentum, Myrtleford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison