Minore vs Orange
Property investment comparison - Minore, NSW 2830 vs Orange, NSW 2800
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Minore wins 2, Orange wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Minore | Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750K | $750K |
| Median unit price | $350K | $505K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.53% | 4.19% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.91% | 4.98% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +0.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Population | 194 | 41,232 |
Minore vs Orange: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $750K in Minore and $750K in Orange.
For units, Minore sits at a median of $350K against $505K in Orange, which makes Minore the more affordable unit market and Orange the pricier one.
On cash flow, Orange leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 3.53% in Minore, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Orange and 1.7% in Minore, so landlords in Orange face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Orange is the bigger suburb, with a population of 41,232 against 194, roughly 213 times the size of Minore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Orange for rental income, Orange for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison