Minto Heights vs Narraweena
Property investment comparison - Minto Heights, NSW 2566 vs Narraweena, NSW 2099
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Minto Heights wins 1, Narraweena wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Minto Heights | Narraweena |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.5M |
| Median unit price | $660K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.34% | 3.86% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| Population | 384 | 6,971 |
Minto Heights vs Narraweena: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Minto Heights and $2.5M in Narraweena.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Narraweena and 1.1% in Minto Heights, so landlords in Narraweena face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Narraweena is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,971 against 384, roughly 18 times the size of Minto Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Narraweena for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison