Skip to main content

Mitcham vs Oakleigh South

Property investment comparison - Mitcham, VIC 3132 vs Oakleigh South, VIC 3167

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mitcham wins 1, Oakleigh South wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMitchamOakleigh South
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$840K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%2.97%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.00%
1-year house growth+3.5%estimate+8.6%
3-year house growth-+10.2%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.6%
Population16,7959,851

Mitcham vs Oakleigh South: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Mitcham and $1.3M in Oakleigh South, so Oakleigh South is the cheaper entry point, with Mitcham houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Oakleigh South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.97%, compared with 2.87% in Mitcham, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.5% in Mitcham (an estimate) and +8.6% in Oakleigh South, so recent momentum favours Oakleigh South, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Mitcham and 1.6% in Oakleigh South, so landlords in Mitcham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mitcham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,795 against 9,851, larger than Oakleigh South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oakleigh South for rental income, Oakleigh South for a lower purchase price, Oakleigh South for recent price momentum, Mitcham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison