Mitcham vs Taminick
Property investment comparison - Mitcham, VIC 3132 vs Taminick, VIC 3675
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mitcham wins 1, Taminick wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mitcham | Taminick |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $840K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.87% | 2.03% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | - |
| Population | 16,795 | 139 |
Mitcham vs Taminick: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Mitcham and $1.3M in Taminick.
On cash flow, Mitcham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.87%, compared with 2.03% in Taminick, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.
Mitcham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,795 against 139, roughly 121 times the size of Taminick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mitcham for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison