Skip to main content

Moama vs Sussex Inlet

Property investment comparison - Moama, NSW 2731 vs Sussex Inlet, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moama wins 3, Sussex Inlet wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoamaSussex Inlet
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$440K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.83%
Gross rental yield (units)5.89%4.10%
1-year house growth-0.2%+2.7%
3-year house growth-5.1%+6.6%
Vacancy rate0.7%3.1%
Population7,2133,888

Moama vs Sussex Inlet: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Moama and $780K in Sussex Inlet.

For units, Moama sits at a median of $440K against $625K in Sussex Inlet, which makes Moama the more affordable unit market and Sussex Inlet the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.2% in Moama and +2.7% in Sussex Inlet, so recent momentum favours Sussex Inlet, while Moama went backwards.

Looking back three years, Moama houses are -5.1% and Sussex Inlet houses +6.6%, so Sussex Inlet has compounded faster than Moama over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Moama and 3.1% in Sussex Inlet, so landlords in Moama face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moama is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,213 against 3,888, larger than Sussex Inlet; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sussex Inlet for recent price momentum, Moama for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison