Moe vs Muskerry
Property investment comparison - Moe, VIC 3825 vs Muskerry, VIC 3557
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moe wins 1, Muskerry wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Moe | Muskerry |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $450K | $450K |
| Median unit price | $295K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.90% | 6.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.74% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +19.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +15.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 3.0% |
| Population | 9,375 | 59 |
Moe vs Muskerry: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $450K in Moe and $450K in Muskerry.
On cash flow, Muskerry leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.30%, compared with 4.90% in Moe, a gap of 1.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Moe and 3.0% in Muskerry, so landlords in Moe face less competition for tenants.
Moe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,375 against 59, roughly 159 times the size of Muskerry; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Muskerry for rental income, Moe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison