Skip to main content

Moglonemby vs Portarlington

Property investment comparison - Moglonemby, VIC 3666 vs Portarlington, VIC 3223

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moglonemby wins 5, Portarlington wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoglonembyPortarlington
Median house price$820K$825K
Median unit price$360K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.82%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)5.03%3.80%
1-year house growth-+3.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%2.1%
Population284,436

Moglonemby vs Portarlington: what the numbers say

The median house price is $820K in Moglonemby and $825K in Portarlington, so Moglonemby is the cheaper entry point, with Portarlington houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Moglonemby sits at a median of $360K against $630K in Portarlington, which makes Moglonemby the more affordable unit market and Portarlington the pricier one.

On cash flow, Moglonemby leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.82%, compared with 3.50% in Portarlington, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Moglonemby and 2.1% in Portarlington, so landlords in Moglonemby face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Portarlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,436 against 28, roughly 158 times the size of Moglonemby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moglonemby for rental income, Moglonemby for a lower purchase price, Moglonemby for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison