Skip to main content

Moglonemby vs Whittlesea

Property investment comparison - Moglonemby, VIC 3666 vs Whittlesea, VIC 3757

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moglonemby wins 2, Whittlesea wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoglonembyWhittlesea
Median house price$820K$820K
Median unit price$360K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.82%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)5.03%5.10%
1-year house growth-+5.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%1.3%
Population286,117

Moglonemby vs Whittlesea: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $820K in Moglonemby and $820K in Whittlesea.

For units, Moglonemby sits at a median of $360K against $455K in Whittlesea, which makes Moglonemby the more affordable unit market and Whittlesea the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.82% in Moglonemby and 3.86% in Whittlesea, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Moglonemby and 1.3% in Whittlesea, so landlords in Moglonemby face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Whittlesea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,117 against 28, roughly 218 times the size of Moglonemby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moglonemby for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison