Skip to main content

Molka vs Newtown

Property investment comparison - Molka, VIC 3666 vs Newtown, VIC 3220

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Molka wins 3, Newtown wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMolkaNewtown
Median house price$1.2M$1.1M
Median unit price$360K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.21%2.96%
Gross rental yield (units)4.75%4.25%
1-year house growth-+3.8%
3-year house growth--9.9%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.8%
Population3410,445

Molka vs Newtown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Molka and $1.1M in Newtown, so Newtown is the cheaper entry point, with Molka houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Molka sits at a median of $360K against $580K in Newtown, which makes Molka the more affordable unit market and Newtown the pricier one.

On cash flow, Newtown leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.96%, compared with 2.21% in Molka, a gap of 0.75 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Molka and 0.8% in Newtown, so landlords in Molka face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,445 against 34, roughly 307 times the size of Molka; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Newtown for rental income, Newtown for a lower purchase price, Molka for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison