Mon Repos vs Rifle Range
Property investment comparison - Mon Repos, QLD 4670 vs Rifle Range, QLD 4311
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mon Repos wins 2, Rifle Range wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mon Repos | Rifle Range |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $585K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.73% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.91% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +61.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 8.5% |
| Population | 24 | 197 |
Mon Repos vs Rifle Range: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Mon Repos and $1.2M in Rifle Range, so Mon Repos is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Mon Repos and 8.5% in Rifle Range, so landlords in Mon Repos face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Rifle Range is the bigger suburb, with a population of 197 against 24, roughly 8 times the size of Mon Repos; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mon Repos for a lower purchase price, Mon Repos for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison