Mona Vale vs St Ives Chase
Property investment comparison - Mona Vale, NSW 2103 vs St Ives Chase, NSW 2075
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mona Vale wins 4, St Ives Chase wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mona Vale | St Ives Chase |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.9M | $2.9M |
| Median unit price | $1.7M | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.37% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.85% | 1.94% |
| 1-year house growth | +2.4% | -7.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +0.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Population | 10,877 | 3,283 |
Mona Vale vs St Ives Chase: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.9M in Mona Vale and $2.9M in St Ives Chase, so Mona Vale is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +2.4% in Mona Vale and -7.0% in St Ives Chase (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mona Vale, while St Ives Chase went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Mona Vale and 2.6% in St Ives Chase, so landlords in Mona Vale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mona Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,877 against 3,283, roughly 3.3 times the size of St Ives Chase; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mona Vale for a lower purchase price, Mona Vale for recent price momentum, Mona Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison