Skip to main content

Mons vs Willawong

Property investment comparison - Mons, QLD 4556 vs Willawong, QLD 4110

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mons wins 1, Willawong wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMonsWillawong
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$920K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%5.07%
1-year house growth+12.2%+8.1%
3-year house growth+31.6%+62.7%
Vacancy rate5.0%0.8%
Population1,179145

Mons vs Willawong: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.8M in Mons and $1.8M in Willawong.

For units, Mons sits at a median of $920K against $460K in Willawong, which makes Willawong the more affordable unit market and Mons the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in Mons and +8.1% in Willawong, so recent momentum favours Mons, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mons houses are +31.6% and Willawong houses +62.7%, so Willawong has compounded faster than Mons over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Willawong and 5.0% in Mons, so landlords in Willawong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mons is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,179 against 145, roughly 8 times the size of Willawong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mons for recent price momentum, Willawong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison