Skip to main content

Mons vs Yaroomba

Property investment comparison - Mons, QLD 4556 vs Yaroomba, QLD 4573

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mons wins 3, Yaroomba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMonsYaroomba
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$920K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%3.83%
1-year house growth+12.2%+11.2%
3-year house growth+31.6%+20.6%
Vacancy rate5.0%1.2%
Population1,1792,043

Mons vs Yaroomba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Mons and $1.8M in Yaroomba, so Mons is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in Mons and +11.2% in Yaroomba, so recent momentum favours Mons, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mons houses are +31.6% and Yaroomba houses +20.6%, so Mons has compounded faster than Yaroomba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Yaroomba and 5.0% in Mons, so landlords in Yaroomba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yaroomba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,043 against 1,179, larger than Mons; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mons for a lower purchase price, Mons for recent price momentum, Yaroomba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison