Monteith vs Tanunda
Property investment comparison - Monteith, SA 5253 vs Tanunda, SA 5352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Monteith wins 0, Tanunda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Monteith | Tanunda |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $830K | $830K |
| Median unit price | - | $555K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.28% | 3.88% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.21% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +44.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Population | 104 | 4,710 |
Monteith vs Tanunda: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Monteith and $830K in Tanunda.
On cash flow, Tanunda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.88%, compared with 3.28% in Monteith, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Tanunda and 1.2% in Monteith, so landlords in Tanunda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tanunda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,710 against 104, roughly 45 times the size of Monteith; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tanunda for rental income, Tanunda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison