Skip to main content

Monterey vs Picketts Valley

Property investment comparison - Monterey, NSW 2217 vs Picketts Valley, NSW 2251

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Monterey wins 0, Picketts Valley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMontereyPicketts Valley
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$930K$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.40%2.46%
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%3.88%
1-year house growth+1.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%1.6%
Population4,619221

Monterey vs Picketts Valley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.6M in Monterey and $2.6M in Picketts Valley.

For units, Monterey sits at a median of $930K against $835K in Picketts Valley, which makes Picketts Valley the more affordable unit market and Monterey the pricier one.

On cash flow, Picketts Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 2.40% in Monterey, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.

Monterey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,619 against 221, roughly 21 times the size of Picketts Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Picketts Valley for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison