Skip to main content

Monterey vs Woolooware

Property investment comparison - Monterey, NSW 2217 vs Woolooware, NSW 2230

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Monterey wins 2, Woolooware wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMontereyWoolooware
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$930K$995K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.40%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%3.92%
1-year house growth+1.2%estimate+6.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%2.4%
Population4,6195,060

Monterey vs Woolooware: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Monterey and $2.6M in Woolooware, so Woolooware is the cheaper entry point, with Monterey houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Monterey sits at a median of $930K against $995K in Woolooware, which makes Monterey the more affordable unit market and Woolooware the pricier one.

On cash flow, Woolooware leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.40% in Monterey, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.2% in Monterey (an estimate) and +6.3% in Woolooware (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woolooware, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Monterey and 2.4% in Woolooware, so landlords in Monterey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woolooware is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,060 against 4,619, larger than Monterey; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woolooware for rental income, Woolooware for a lower purchase price, Woolooware for recent price momentum, Monterey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison