Skip to main content

Montrose vs Ocean Grove

Property investment comparison - Montrose, VIC 3765 vs Ocean Grove, VIC 3226

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Montrose wins 2, Ocean Grove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMontroseOcean Grove
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.63%3.40%
Gross rental yield (units)3.52%3.84%
1-year house growth+2.9%+3.4%estimate
3-year house growth+15.8%-
Vacancy rate0.3%1.9%
Population6,90017,714

Montrose vs Ocean Grove: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Montrose and $980K in Ocean Grove.

On cash flow, Montrose leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.63%, compared with 3.40% in Ocean Grove, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.9% in Montrose and +3.4% in Ocean Grove (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ocean Grove, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Montrose and 1.9% in Ocean Grove, so landlords in Montrose face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ocean Grove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,714 against 6,900, roughly 2.6 times the size of Montrose; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Montrose for rental income, Ocean Grove for recent price momentum, Montrose for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison