Montrose vs Tremont
Property investment comparison - Montrose, VIC 3765 vs Tremont, VIC 3785
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Montrose wins 3, Tremont wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Montrose | Tremont |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $980K | $990K |
| Median unit price | - | $490K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.63% | 4.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.52% | 2.99% |
| 1-year house growth | +2.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +15.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.3% | 1.1% |
| Population | 6,900 | 69 |
Montrose vs Tremont: what the numbers say
The median house price is $980K in Montrose and $990K in Tremont, so Montrose is the cheaper entry point, with Tremont houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Tremont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.08%, compared with 3.63% in Montrose, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Montrose and 1.1% in Tremont, so landlords in Montrose face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Montrose is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,900 against 69, roughly 100 times the size of Tremont; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tremont for rental income, Montrose for a lower purchase price, Montrose for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison