Skip to main content

Mooball vs Terrey Hills

Property investment comparison - Mooball, NSW 2483 vs Terrey Hills, NSW 2084

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mooball wins 4, Terrey Hills wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMooballTerrey Hills
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$880K$2.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.36%3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)4.21%1.90%
1-year house growth-+0.6%
3-year house growth-+6.7%
Vacancy rate0.6%0.7%
Population1933,142

Mooball vs Terrey Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Mooball and $2.3M in Terrey Hills, so Mooball is the cheaper entry point, with Terrey Hills houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Mooball sits at a median of $880K against $2.4M in Terrey Hills, which makes Mooball the more affordable unit market and Terrey Hills the pricier one.

On cash flow, Terrey Hills leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.14%, compared with 2.36% in Mooball, a gap of 0.78 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mooball and 0.7% in Terrey Hills, so landlords in Mooball face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Terrey Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,142 against 193, roughly 16 times the size of Mooball; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Terrey Hills for rental income, Mooball for a lower purchase price, Mooball for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison