Skip to main content

Moobi vs Taree

Property investment comparison - Moobi, NSW 2337 vs Taree, NSW 2430

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moobi wins 5, Taree wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoobiTaree
Median house price$580K$590K
Median unit price$320K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.20%4.51%
Gross rental yield (units)6.64%5.20%
1-year house growth-+7.4%
3-year house growth-+12.4%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.2%
Population16816,715

Moobi vs Taree: what the numbers say

The median house price is $580K in Moobi and $590K in Taree, so Moobi is the cheaper entry point, with Taree houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Moobi sits at a median of $320K against $400K in Taree, which makes Moobi the more affordable unit market and Taree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Moobi leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.51% in Taree, a gap of 0.69 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Moobi and 1.2% in Taree, so landlords in Moobi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,715 against 168, roughly 99 times the size of Moobi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moobi for rental income, Moobi for a lower purchase price, Moobi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison