Skip to main content

Moonee Beach vs Smithfield

Property investment comparison - Moonee Beach, NSW 2450 vs Smithfield, NSW 2164

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moonee Beach wins 2, Smithfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoonee BeachSmithfield
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.54%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%3.45%
1-year house growth+12.5%+8.7%
3-year house growth+9.0%+19.1%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.1%
Population2,17613,160

Moonee Beach vs Smithfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Moonee Beach and $1.3M in Smithfield, so Smithfield is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.5% in Moonee Beach and +8.7% in Smithfield, so recent momentum favours Moonee Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Moonee Beach houses are +9.0% and Smithfield houses +19.1%, so Smithfield has compounded faster than Moonee Beach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Smithfield and 2.0% in Moonee Beach, so landlords in Smithfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Smithfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,160 against 2,176, roughly 6 times the size of Moonee Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Smithfield for a lower purchase price, Moonee Beach for recent price momentum, Smithfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison