Skip to main content

Moonta Bay vs Munno Para Downs

Property investment comparison - Moonta Bay, SA 5558 vs Munno Para Downs, SA 5115

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moonta Bay wins 4, Munno Para Downs wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoonta BayMunno Para Downs
Median house price$695K$705K
Median unit price$335K$390K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.57%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.33%6.03%
1-year house growth+14.8%+11.8%estimate
3-year house growth+54.4%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.2%
Population2,633181

Moonta Bay vs Munno Para Downs: what the numbers say

The median house price is $695K in Moonta Bay and $705K in Munno Para Downs, so Moonta Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Munno Para Downs houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Moonta Bay sits at a median of $335K against $390K in Munno Para Downs, which makes Moonta Bay the more affordable unit market and Munno Para Downs the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.8% in Moonta Bay and +11.8% in Munno Para Downs (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Moonta Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Moonta Bay and 1.2% in Munno Para Downs, so landlords in Moonta Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moonta Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,633 against 181, roughly 15 times the size of Munno Para Downs; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moonta Bay for a lower purchase price, Moonta Bay for recent price momentum, Moonta Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison