Moora vs Naturaliste
Property investment comparison - Moora, WA 6510 vs Naturaliste, WA 6281
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moora wins 2, Naturaliste wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Moora | Naturaliste |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $335K | $370K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.81% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.2% | 1.6% |
| Population | 1,755 | 107 |
Moora vs Naturaliste: what the numbers say
The median house price is $335K in Moora and $370K in Naturaliste, so Moora is the cheaper entry point, with Naturaliste houses about 10% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Moora and 1.6% in Naturaliste, so landlords in Moora face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Moora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,755 against 107, roughly 16 times the size of Naturaliste; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Moora for a lower purchase price, Moora for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison