Skip to main content

Moorabbin vs Mount Moriac

Property investment comparison - Moorabbin, VIC 3189 vs Mount Moriac, VIC 3240

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moorabbin wins 3, Mount Moriac wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoorabbinMount Moriac
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$765K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%2.83%
Gross rental yield (units)4.42%7.14%
1-year house growth+6.1%-
3-year house growth-0.8%-
Vacancy rate1.0%6.3%
Population6,287251

Moorabbin vs Mount Moriac: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Moorabbin and $1.3M in Mount Moriac, so Moorabbin is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Moriac houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Moorabbin sits at a median of $765K against $425K in Mount Moriac, which makes Mount Moriac the more affordable unit market and Moorabbin the pricier one.

On cash flow, Moorabbin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.83% in Mount Moriac, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Moorabbin and 6.3% in Mount Moriac, so landlords in Moorabbin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moorabbin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,287 against 251, roughly 25 times the size of Mount Moriac; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moorabbin for rental income, Moorabbin for a lower purchase price, Moorabbin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison