Skip to main content

Moores Pocket vs Rockville

Property investment comparison - Moores Pocket, QLD 4305 vs Rockville, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moores Pocket wins 2, Rockville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoores PocketRockville
Median house price$715K$715K
Median unit price$240K$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.70%
1-year house growth+17.8%+19.9%
3-year house growth+74.0%+65.8%
Vacancy rate4.2%1.0%
Population7723,204

Moores Pocket vs Rockville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $715K in Moores Pocket and $715K in Rockville.

For units, Moores Pocket sits at a median of $240K against $615K in Rockville, which makes Moores Pocket the more affordable unit market and Rockville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.8% in Moores Pocket and +19.9% in Rockville, so recent momentum favours Rockville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Moores Pocket houses are +74.0% and Rockville houses +65.8%, so Moores Pocket has compounded faster than Rockville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Rockville and 4.2% in Moores Pocket, so landlords in Rockville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rockville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,204 against 772, roughly 4.2 times the size of Moores Pocket; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rockville for recent price momentum, Rockville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison