Skip to main content

Moorilim vs Richmond

Property investment comparison - Moorilim, VIC 3610 vs Richmond, VIC 3121

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moorilim wins 3, Richmond wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoorilimRichmond
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$455K$780K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.78%3.41%
Gross rental yield (units)4.60%4.13%
1-year house growth--3.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.9%1.8%
Population2528,587

Moorilim vs Richmond: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Moorilim and $1.4M in Richmond, so Moorilim is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Moorilim sits at a median of $455K against $780K in Richmond, which makes Moorilim the more affordable unit market and Richmond the pricier one.

On cash flow, Richmond leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.41%, compared with 1.78% in Moorilim, a gap of 1.63 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Richmond and 3.9% in Moorilim, so landlords in Richmond face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Richmond is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,587 against 25, roughly 1143 times the size of Moorilim; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Richmond for rental income, Moorilim for a lower purchase price, Richmond for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison