Skip to main content

Moorland vs Pages River

Property investment comparison - Moorland, NSW 2443 vs Pages River, NSW 2337

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moorland wins 1, Pages River wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoorlandPages River
Median house price$580K$585K
Median unit price$570K$320K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.88%5.72%
Gross rental yield (units)3.80%7.38%
1-year house growth+3.8%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population5165

Moorland vs Pages River: what the numbers say

The median house price is $580K in Moorland and $585K in Pages River, so Moorland is the cheaper entry point, with Pages River houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Moorland sits at a median of $570K against $320K in Pages River, which makes Pages River the more affordable unit market and Moorland the pricier one.

On cash flow, Pages River leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.72%, compared with 3.88% in Moorland, a gap of 1.84 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Pages River and 2.0% in Moorland, so landlords in Pages River face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moorland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 516 against 5, roughly 103 times the size of Pages River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pages River for rental income, Moorland for a lower purchase price, Pages River for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison