Skip to main content

Mooroopna North vs Wangaratta

Property investment comparison - Mooroopna North, VIC 3629 vs Wangaratta, VIC 3677

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mooroopna North wins 2, Wangaratta wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMooroopna NorthWangaratta
Median house price$565K$565K
Median unit price$310K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%4.90%
Gross rental yield (units)5.43%5.30%
1-year house growth-+7.6%
3-year house growth-+9.0%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population14419,214

Mooroopna North vs Wangaratta: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $565K in Mooroopna North and $565K in Wangaratta.

For units, Mooroopna North sits at a median of $310K against $400K in Wangaratta, which makes Mooroopna North the more affordable unit market and Wangaratta the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wangaratta leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 4.70% in Mooroopna North, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wangaratta and 1.3% in Mooroopna North, so landlords in Wangaratta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wangaratta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,214 against 144, roughly 133 times the size of Mooroopna North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wangaratta for rental income, Wangaratta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison