Skip to main content

Mooroopna vs Wurruk

Property investment comparison - Mooroopna, VIC 3629 vs Wurruk, VIC 3850

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mooroopna wins 3, Wurruk wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMooroopnaWurruk
Median house price$485K$485K
Median unit price$315K$250K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.00%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.65%7.44%
1-year house growth+12.8%+12.1%estimate
3-year house growth+23.2%-
Vacancy rate1.2%1.5%
Population8,3121,177

Mooroopna vs Wurruk: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $485K in Mooroopna and $485K in Wurruk.

For units, Mooroopna sits at a median of $315K against $250K in Wurruk, which makes Wurruk the more affordable unit market and Mooroopna the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mooroopna leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 4.80% in Wurruk, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.8% in Mooroopna and +12.1% in Wurruk (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mooroopna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Mooroopna and 1.5% in Wurruk, so landlords in Mooroopna face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mooroopna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,312 against 1,177, roughly 7 times the size of Wurruk; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mooroopna for rental income, Mooroopna for recent price momentum, Mooroopna for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison