Skip to main content

Moranbah vs Mount St John

Property investment comparison - Moranbah, QLD 4744 vs Mount St John, QLD 4818

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moranbah wins 2, Mount St John wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoranbahMount St John
Median house price$400K$395K
Median unit price$390K$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)8.00%8.43%
Gross rental yield (units)8.27%6.55%
1-year house growth+3.0%-
3-year house growth+23.1%-
Vacancy rate1.8%1.4%
Population9,425103

Moranbah vs Mount St John: what the numbers say

The median house price is $400K in Moranbah and $395K in Mount St John, so Mount St John is the cheaper entry point, with Moranbah houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Moranbah sits at a median of $390K against $410K in Mount St John, which makes Moranbah the more affordable unit market and Mount St John the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mount St John leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.43%, compared with 8.00% in Moranbah, a gap of 0.43 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Mount St John and 1.8% in Moranbah, so landlords in Mount St John face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moranbah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,425 against 103, roughly 92 times the size of Mount St John; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount St John for rental income, Mount St John for a lower purchase price, Mount St John for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison