Skip to main content

Moruya vs Orient Point

Property investment comparison - Moruya, NSW 2537 vs Orient Point, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Moruya wins 4, Orient Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMoruyaOrient Point
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price-$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%3.57%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%4.65%
1-year house growth+3.4%+6.7%
3-year house growth+2.5%-1.2%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.3%
Population4,295629

Moruya vs Orient Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Moruya and $800K in Orient Point.

On cash flow, Moruya leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.03%, compared with 3.57% in Orient Point, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.4% in Moruya and +6.7% in Orient Point, so recent momentum favours Orient Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Moruya houses are +2.5% and Orient Point houses -1.2%, so Moruya has compounded faster than Orient Point over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Moruya and 1.3% in Orient Point, so landlords in Moruya face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Moruya is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,295 against 629, roughly 7 times the size of Orient Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Moruya for rental income, Orient Point for recent price momentum, Moruya for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison