Mount Bolton vs Tootgarook
Property investment comparison - Mount Bolton, VIC 3352 vs Tootgarook, VIC 3941
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Bolton wins 0, Tootgarook wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mount Bolton | Tootgarook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $885K | $885K |
| Median unit price | $520K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.85% | 3.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -0.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Population | 29 | 3,178 |
Mount Bolton vs Tootgarook: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $885K in Mount Bolton and $885K in Tootgarook.
On cash flow, Tootgarook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.85% in Mount Bolton, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Tootgarook and 1.6% in Mount Bolton, so landlords in Tootgarook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tootgarook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,178 against 29, roughly 110 times the size of Mount Bolton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tootgarook for rental income, Tootgarook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison