Skip to main content

Mount Buffalo vs Viewbank

Property investment comparison - Mount Buffalo, VIC 3740 vs Viewbank, VIC 3084

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Buffalo wins 2, Viewbank wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount BuffaloViewbank
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$155K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.80%3.24%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.90%
1-year house growth-+0.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%3.0%
Population57,030

Mount Buffalo vs Viewbank: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Mount Buffalo and $1.2M in Viewbank, so Viewbank is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mount Buffalo sits at a median of $155K against $730K in Viewbank, which makes Mount Buffalo the more affordable unit market and Viewbank the pricier one.

On cash flow, Viewbank leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.24%, compared with 2.80% in Mount Buffalo, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Mount Buffalo and 3.0% in Viewbank, so landlords in Mount Buffalo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Viewbank is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,030 against 5, roughly 1406 times the size of Mount Buffalo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Viewbank for rental income, Viewbank for a lower purchase price, Mount Buffalo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison