Skip to main content

Mount Cotton vs Tingalpa

Property investment comparison - Mount Cotton, QLD 4165 vs Tingalpa, QLD 4173

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Cotton wins 1, Tingalpa wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount CottonTingalpa
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$1.1M$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)3.85%-
1-year house growth+15.1%estimate+12.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.0%
Population7,3028,461

Mount Cotton vs Tingalpa: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Mount Cotton and $1.2M in Tingalpa, so Tingalpa is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mount Cotton sits at a median of $1.1M against $815K in Tingalpa, which makes Tingalpa the more affordable unit market and Mount Cotton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.1% in Mount Cotton (an estimate) and +12.8% in Tingalpa (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mount Cotton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Tingalpa and 2.6% in Mount Cotton, so landlords in Tingalpa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tingalpa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,461 against 7,302, larger than Mount Cotton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tingalpa for a lower purchase price, Mount Cotton for recent price momentum, Tingalpa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison