Skip to main content

Mount Elliot vs Paterson

Property investment comparison - Mount Elliot, NSW 2250 vs Paterson, NSW 2421

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Elliot wins 3, Paterson wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount ElliotPaterson
Median house price$950K$950K
Median unit price$605K$465K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.14%3.56%
Gross rental yield (units)5.72%3.78%
1-year house growth--2.7%
3-year house growth-+10.7%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.6%
Population169960

Mount Elliot vs Paterson: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $950K in Mount Elliot and $950K in Paterson.

For units, Mount Elliot sits at a median of $605K against $465K in Paterson, which makes Paterson the more affordable unit market and Mount Elliot the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mount Elliot leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.14%, compared with 3.56% in Paterson, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Mount Elliot and 1.6% in Paterson, so landlords in Mount Elliot face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Paterson is the bigger suburb, with a population of 960 against 169, roughly 6 times the size of Mount Elliot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Elliot for rental income, Mount Elliot for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison