Skip to main content

Mount Elphinstone vs Wanneroo

Property investment comparison - Mount Elphinstone, WA 6330 vs Wanneroo, WA 6065

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Elphinstone wins 3, Wanneroo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount ElphinstoneWanneroo
Median house price$905K$900K
Median unit price$270K$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.67%4.32%
Gross rental yield (units)10.54%4.70%
1-year house growth-+19.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.3%1.1%
Population8212,113

Mount Elphinstone vs Wanneroo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $905K in Mount Elphinstone and $900K in Wanneroo, so Wanneroo is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Elphinstone houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Mount Elphinstone sits at a median of $270K against $760K in Wanneroo, which makes Mount Elphinstone the more affordable unit market and Wanneroo the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mount Elphinstone leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.67%, compared with 4.32% in Wanneroo, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Wanneroo and 3.3% in Mount Elphinstone, so landlords in Wanneroo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wanneroo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,113 against 82, roughly 148 times the size of Mount Elphinstone; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Elphinstone for rental income, Wanneroo for a lower purchase price, Wanneroo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison