Skip to main content

Mount Hutton vs Nana Glen

Property investment comparison - Mount Hutton, NSW 2290 vs Nana Glen, NSW 2450

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Hutton wins 2, Nana Glen wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount HuttonNana Glen
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price$750K$565K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.67%
Gross rental yield (units)4.82%4.41%
1-year house growth+10.4%+13.9%estimate
3-year house growth+29.5%-
Vacancy rate1.0%1.6%
Population3,7121,132

Mount Hutton vs Nana Glen: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Mount Hutton and $900K in Nana Glen.

For units, Mount Hutton sits at a median of $750K against $565K in Nana Glen, which makes Nana Glen the more affordable unit market and Mount Hutton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Mount Hutton and +13.9% in Nana Glen (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Nana Glen, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Mount Hutton and 1.6% in Nana Glen, so landlords in Mount Hutton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mount Hutton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,712 against 1,132, roughly 3.3 times the size of Nana Glen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nana Glen for recent price momentum, Mount Hutton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison