Mount Low vs Nelly Bay
Property investment comparison - Mount Low, QLD 4818 vs Nelly Bay, QLD 4819
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Low wins 3, Nelly Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mount Low | Nelly Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $725K | $725K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.56% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.54% | 4.24% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.5% | +9.2% |
| 3-year house growth | +64.4% | +34.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.2% |
| Population | 5,488 | 1,213 |
Mount Low vs Nelly Bay: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $725K in Mount Low and $725K in Nelly Bay.
Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Mount Low and +9.2% in Nelly Bay, so recent momentum favours Mount Low, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Mount Low houses are +64.4% and Nelly Bay houses +34.0%, so Mount Low has compounded faster than Nelly Bay over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Nelly Bay and 1.3% in Mount Low, so landlords in Nelly Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mount Low is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,488 against 1,213, roughly 4.5 times the size of Nelly Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Low for recent price momentum, Nelly Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison