Skip to main content

Mount Pritchard vs Oran Park

Property investment comparison - Mount Pritchard, NSW 2170 vs Oran Park, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Pritchard wins 2, Oran Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount PritchardOran Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.82%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.76%-
1-year house growth+6.4%+9.9%
3-year house growth+35.0%+11.0%
Vacancy rate2.0%2.5%
Population10,42617,624

Mount Pritchard vs Oran Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Mount Pritchard and $1.2M in Oran Park.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.4% in Mount Pritchard and +9.9% in Oran Park, so recent momentum favours Oran Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mount Pritchard houses are +35.0% and Oran Park houses +11.0%, so Mount Pritchard has compounded faster than Oran Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Mount Pritchard and 2.5% in Oran Park, so landlords in Mount Pritchard face less competition for tenants.

Oran Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,624 against 10,426, larger than Mount Pritchard; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oran Park for recent price momentum, Mount Pritchard for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison