Skip to main content

Mount Richmond vs Watsonia North

Property investment comparison - Mount Richmond, VIC 3305 vs Watsonia North, VIC 3087

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Richmond wins 1, Watsonia North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount RichmondWatsonia North
Median house price$965K$970K
Median unit price-$765K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.97%3.32%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.34%
1-year house growth--3.6%
3-year house growth-+4.3%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.6%
Population423,799

Mount Richmond vs Watsonia North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $965K in Mount Richmond and $970K in Watsonia North, so Mount Richmond is the cheaper entry point, with Watsonia North houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Watsonia North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.32%, compared with 2.97% in Mount Richmond, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Watsonia North and 2.4% in Mount Richmond, so landlords in Watsonia North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Watsonia North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,799 against 42, roughly 90 times the size of Mount Richmond; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Watsonia North for rental income, Mount Richmond for a lower purchase price, Watsonia North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison