Skip to main content

Mount Sheridan vs Mount Urah

Property investment comparison - Mount Sheridan, QLD 4868 vs Mount Urah, QLD 4650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Sheridan wins 2, Mount Urah wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount SheridanMount Urah
Median house price$740K$740K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.70%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)5.08%-
1-year house growth+14.7%-
3-year house growth+47.2%-
Vacancy rate0.8%12.5%
Population8,67849

Mount Sheridan vs Mount Urah: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Mount Sheridan and $740K in Mount Urah.

On cash flow, Mount Sheridan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 3.38% in Mount Urah, a gap of 1.32 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Mount Sheridan and 12.5% in Mount Urah, so landlords in Mount Sheridan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mount Sheridan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,678 against 49, roughly 177 times the size of Mount Urah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Sheridan for rental income, Mount Sheridan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison