Skip to main content

Mount Warrigal vs North Batemans Bay

Property investment comparison - Mount Warrigal, NSW 2528 vs North Batemans Bay, NSW 2536

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Warrigal wins 3, North Batemans Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount WarrigalNorth Batemans Bay
Median house price$950K$950K
Median unit price$810K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.05%3.28%
Gross rental yield (units)4.28%4.80%
1-year house growth+7.2%+1.7%estimate
3-year house growth+24.4%-
Vacancy rate0.9%1.1%
Population4,880794

Mount Warrigal vs North Batemans Bay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $950K in Mount Warrigal and $950K in North Batemans Bay.

On cash flow, Mount Warrigal leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.28% in North Batemans Bay, a gap of 0.77 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.2% in Mount Warrigal and +1.7% in North Batemans Bay (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mount Warrigal, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Mount Warrigal and 1.1% in North Batemans Bay, so landlords in Mount Warrigal face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mount Warrigal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,880 against 794, roughly 6 times the size of North Batemans Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Warrigal for rental income, Mount Warrigal for recent price momentum, Mount Warrigal for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison