Skip to main content

Mount Waverley vs South Melbourne

Property investment comparison - Mount Waverley, VIC 3149 vs South Melbourne, VIC 3205

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mount Waverley wins 1, South Melbourne wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMount WaverleySouth Melbourne
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$1.1M$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.09%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.90%
1-year house growth-2.8%+0.4%estimate
3-year house growth+0.8%-
Vacancy rate1.7%1.2%
Population35,34011,548

Mount Waverley vs South Melbourne: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Mount Waverley and $1.6M in South Melbourne, so Mount Waverley is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mount Waverley sits at a median of $1.1M against $600K in South Melbourne, which makes South Melbourne the more affordable unit market and Mount Waverley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.8% in Mount Waverley and +0.4% in South Melbourne (an estimate), so recent momentum favours South Melbourne, while Mount Waverley went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in South Melbourne and 1.7% in Mount Waverley, so landlords in South Melbourne face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mount Waverley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 35,340 against 11,548, roughly 3.1 times the size of South Melbourne; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mount Waverley for a lower purchase price, South Melbourne for recent price momentum, South Melbourne for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison