Skip to main content

Mudgegonga vs Werribee

Property investment comparison - Mudgegonga, VIC 3737 vs Werribee, VIC 3030

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mudgegonga wins 3, Werribee wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMudgegongaWerribee
Median house price$670K$675K
Median unit price$660K$475K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.68%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)2.81%4.45%
1-year house growth-+9.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%2.4%
Population18450,027

Mudgegonga vs Werribee: what the numbers say

The median house price is $670K in Mudgegonga and $675K in Werribee, so Mudgegonga is the cheaper entry point, with Werribee houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Mudgegonga sits at a median of $660K against $475K in Werribee, which makes Werribee the more affordable unit market and Mudgegonga the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mudgegonga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.68%, compared with 3.70% in Werribee, a gap of 0.98 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Mudgegonga and 2.4% in Werribee, so landlords in Mudgegonga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Werribee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 50,027 against 184, roughly 272 times the size of Mudgegonga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mudgegonga for rental income, Mudgegonga for a lower purchase price, Mudgegonga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison