Skip to main content

Mulgoa vs Towradgi

Property investment comparison - Mulgoa, NSW 2745 vs Towradgi, NSW 2518

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mulgoa wins 4, Towradgi wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMulgoaTowradgi
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$755K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.62%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.53%3.50%
1-year house growth+20.2%estimate+7.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.5%0.7%
Population2,0443,241

Mulgoa vs Towradgi: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Mulgoa and $1.4M in Towradgi, so Towradgi is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mulgoa sits at a median of $755K against $850K in Towradgi, which makes Mulgoa the more affordable unit market and Towradgi the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mulgoa leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.62%, compared with 3.00% in Towradgi, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.2% in Mulgoa (an estimate) and +7.5% in Towradgi (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mulgoa, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Towradgi and 2.5% in Mulgoa, so landlords in Towradgi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Towradgi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,241 against 2,044, larger than Mulgoa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mulgoa for rental income, Towradgi for a lower purchase price, Mulgoa for recent price momentum, Towradgi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison